Skip to main content
1300 206 309
Care Alliance Allied Health & Supports

Therapy & clinical supports

What is a behaviour support plan? How to read yours

Care Alliance clinical team · Updated 15 August 2026 · 6 min read

A behaviour support plan — almost everyone says BSP — is the working document that sets out how a person is supported when behaviours of concern are part of their life. It isn't a report that gets filed away. It's meant to be used daily by the people around the person: family, support workers, SIL staff, teachers. This guide explains what goes in one, how the interim and comprehensive versions differ, and how to tell a plan written for a person from a plan written for a filing cabinet. For the wider framework these plans sit inside, start with [what positive behaviour support is](/resources/what-is-positive-behaviour-support).

What a behaviour support plan is for

The purpose of a BSP is consistency. Behaviours of concern get worse when the people around someone respond in different ways — one support worker gives in, another holds a hard line, a third avoids the situation entirely. The person learns that outcomes are unpredictable, which is stressful in itself.

A good plan replaces that with one agreed approach that everyone follows. It records what the behaviour is communicating, what to do before things escalate, and what to do if they do. It should be readable by someone on their first shift.

Interim and comprehensive plans

There are two kinds, and they do different jobs.

An interim plan is written quickly, early on, when there is an immediate risk or a restrictive practice already in use. It exists to make things safe and lawful while the practitioner does the real assessment work. It is deliberately short and provisional.

A comprehensive plan follows once the functional behaviour assessment is complete. Note this is a functional behaviour assessment, which works out why behaviours are happening — not a functional capacity assessment, which is a different piece of work looking at daily living skills. It is built on evidence gathered across settings and over time, and it is the plan that should actually change someone's life. Both types have review timeframes set by the NDIS Commission, and a plan that has drifted past its review date is a plan nobody is monitoring.

What should be in the plan

The structure varies between practitioners, but a plan that is missing any of these is incomplete:

  • A picture of the person — what they enjoy, what matters to them, how they communicate, what a good day looks like. If this section is thin, the rest usually is too
  • The behaviours of concern, described specifically — not 'aggression' but what actually happens, so everyone recognises the same thing
  • What each behaviour achieves for the person — its function. This is the heart of the plan
  • Proactive strategies — the environmental and routine changes that stop things building in the first place
  • Skill-building — what the person is being taught so they can meet the same need another way
  • Early warning signs and de-escalation — what escalation looks like for this person specifically
  • Reactive strategies — exactly what to do if the behaviour happens, keeping everyone safe and the person's dignity intact
  • Any restrictive practices, with the authorisation details and a plan to reduce them
  • Who needs training, and when the plan gets reviewed against data

Restrictive practices in the plan

If a plan includes a regulated restrictive practice — anything restricting a person's rights or freedom of movement, such as locked areas, certain medications used to manage behaviour, or limits on access to items — that part is tightly regulated. It must be authorised under your state's rules, set out in a lodged plan, reported to the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission, and used only as a last resort.

Here is the quality test worth applying: does the plan treat each restrictive practice as a problem to be worked out over time, with an actual strategy for reducing it? A plan that lists restrictive practices and simply leaves them there is not doing its job.

How to tell a good plan from a generic one

Plans vary enormously in quality, and families are rarely told what to look for. Some honest markers:

  • It sounds like the person. If you could swap the name for anyone else's and the plan would still fit, it was not written for them
  • The strategies are things your team can actually do on a Tuesday afternoon, with the staff and resources you really have
  • It explains the why, not just the what — so a worker facing a situation the plan didn't predict can still make a sensible decision
  • It was built on real observation across settings, not one clinic visit and a phone call
  • Someone has trained the team in it, and the team can tell you what's in it without going to look

Your rights around the plan

The plan belongs to the person it is about. Participants and their families are entitled to be involved in developing it, to have it explained in a way they understand, to disagree with parts of it, and to change practitioner if it isn't working. You can ask for a copy at any time.

If a plan was written without anyone spending real time with the person, you are entitled to say so. Care Alliance's behaviour support practitioners work across Newcastle, the Hunter and the Central Coast inside a psychologist-led team, and are happy to look over an existing plan with you — including one written by someone else.

Common questions

Who writes a behaviour support plan?

A behaviour support practitioner considered suitable by the NDIS Commission. Practitioners come from a range of backgrounds — psychology, occupational therapy, social work, speech pathology, nursing — and are assessed against the PBS Capability Framework rather than one specific qualification.

Do support workers have to follow the plan?

Yes. Everyone supporting the person is expected to work to the plan, and providers are responsible for making sure their staff are trained in it. Consistency across the whole team is what makes a plan work — a plan followed by half the team usually achieves very little.

How often is a behaviour support plan reviewed?

Both interim and comprehensive plans have review timeframes set by the NDIS Commission, with interim plans reviewed more frequently. Beyond the formal requirement, a plan should be revisited whenever something significant changes — a new home, a new school, a health issue, or data showing the strategies are not working.

Can I get a second opinion on a plan?

Yes. You can engage a different practitioner to review an existing plan, and you can change practitioners without needing to justify it. If a plan is not improving daily life after a fair trial, that is a reasonable thing to act on.

Is a behaviour support plan the same as a functional behaviour assessment?

No — the assessment comes first and works out why behaviours are happening. The plan is what gets built from those findings. A plan produced without a proper assessment behind it is guesswork. A functional behaviour assessment is also a different thing again to a functional capacity assessment, which looks at daily living skills and is usually done by an occupational therapist.

This guide is general information about the NDIS, not advice about your individual situation, and scheme rules change over time. For decisions about your plan, check the current guidance at ndis.gov.au or talk to your support coordinator, planner — or call us on 1300 206 309.

Ready to talk it through?

Call, email or send an online referral — we'll help you work out what support fits, with no obligation.